# Artificial Intelligence: A Misunderstood Phenomenon
Written on
Chapter 1: Understanding AI's Limitations
In the realm of human cognition, our limited brain capacity leads us to frequently oversimplify complex realities. This simplification often results in distorted perceptions, particularly regarding the threats posed by Artificial Intelligence (AI). Nowadays, it seems to be a trend to express fears about AI's potential danger to humanity. Some experts, who should know better, have made claims suggesting that AI is the greatest peril we face—a statement as ludicrous as suggesting that, amidst historical catastrophes, a child with a toy catapult was Europe's main concern in 1279.
What exactly is AI?
At its core, AI consists of algorithms—mathematical formulas crafted in programming languages that enable systems to perform impressive pattern recognition tasks. While there are superficial similarities between AI functions and certain human brain activities, those similarities end there.
AI can effectively differentiate between images of cats and dogs, assist in facial recognition (albeit with vulnerabilities), and analyze various datasets for patterns. However, it remains constrained within its narrowly defined parameters, just as a bicycle cannot transform into an airplane.
The confusion surrounding AI's potential dangers stems from a general lack of understanding about its workings and the nature of consciousness. To clarify these concepts, let’s delve into why fears surrounding AI are as unfounded as believing your pet hamster is plotting world domination.
AI operates based on extensive data analysis. It identifies similarities by adjusting the weights of data elements through repeated iterations, improving its accuracy with each cycle. Picture an AI program as a network of connections that strengthen or weaken based on detected similarities or differences.
Image credit: AI Magazine
However, personal digital assistants don’t function like this. These chatbots, designed to mimic interaction, are limited and primarily pre-programmed. They lack true intelligence, comparable to a basic calculator.
True AI applications can detect anomalies in medical imaging, forecast weather patterns, analyze traffic, and more. However, a system tailored for traffic analysis is not suited for medical diagnostics, much like the human brain's visual processing centers aren't built for composing music. While the underlying principles may be similar, the specific implementations and training datasets differ significantly.
Thus, no AI program can "break free" and dominate the world, just as a car's automatic parking feature cannot decide to embark on a vacation.
Exploring Consciousness
Next, let’s address the other half of the AI fear narrative: consciousness. In reality, humans possess only a limited and often illusory sense of consciousness. Much of our cognitive processing occurs unconsciously, as our brains manage numerous regulatory tasks like heart rate, blood pressure, and sensory input without our awareness.
We might think we are aware of our surroundings, but studies reveal that our perception is limited and often inaccurate. Even trained professionals' eyewitness accounts can be unreliable.
Moreover, we frequently lack insight into our true motivations, and our behaviors are largely instinctual. This means that our sense of consciousness is fragmented and often mistaken. Consider the last time you found yourself driving and suddenly realized you were almost at your destination without consciously remembering the journey.
Sensory deprivation studies further illustrate that without external stimuli, humans become disoriented and may even hallucinate. How, then, would a disembodied computer program manage without sensory input?
Our thoughts, feelings, and actions are shaped by millennia of evolutionary processes, primarily influenced by our emotional and hormonal systems. Without these elements, how could an AI program, hypothetically endowed with self-awareness, develop purpose or intent?
It would be beneficial for humanity to cultivate greater consciousness. If we avoid self-destruction, perhaps in hundreds of thousands of years, we could achieve this. However, even if we advance our consciousness, a general-purpose AI capable of self-awareness would merely emulate human behavior unless we meticulously replicate the sensory and emotional frameworks that drive us.
This scenario parallels suggesting to a Victorian inventor that we might one day create a human-like automaton powered by steam. By the time such technology is feasible, more compelling challenges will likely arise.
The same logic applies to AI.
Chapter 2: The Future of AI
The following video explores why AI will enhance our work environments rather than pose a threat.
The next video delves into the philosophical debate of whether AI will ultimately save or destroy us.