The Connection Between Evolution and Depression: An Exploration
Written on
The relationship between evolution and depression is intricate and thought-provoking. Humans often consider themselves distinct from other species, yet we are as much a product of evolution as any creature. The genus Homo evolved from Australopithecus over millions of years, resulting in nine known human species, including Homo neanderthalensis and Homo erectus, culminating in Homo sapiens.
Today, all living individuals belong to Homo sapiens, while other human species have gone extinct, primarily due to the competitive advantages of our own kind. As Jean-Jacques Hublin from the Max Planck Institute notes, "The Neanderthals were displaced very soon after modern humans encroached on their habitat."
Homo sapiens emerged as the species best adapted for survival, with evolutionary focus on brain development that fostered strong social connections and innovative tool use. Physical strength became less crucial; intelligence took precedence.
The history of human evolution is complex, tracing back 5 to 7 million years to when early hominins began walking upright. Today, one can communicate ideas across continents, a testament to our evolution from humble beginnings to global dominance, now even reaching toward the cosmos.
Charles Darwin, a pioneering figure in evolutionary theory, is believed to have battled depression, finding solace in his work. He remarked, "Work is the only thing which makes life endurable to me," indicating that his scientific pursuits offered him some respite.
Paradoxically, depression seems at odds with Darwin's evolutionary principles. Characterized by apathy, lack of interest, lethargy, and sometimes suicidal thoughts, depression appears counterproductive to survival and reproduction—core tenets of evolution. Alarmingly, suicide rates outpace those from murder and war, with chronic depression often cited as a leading cause.
Some theorists argue that modern societal and technological advancements may overwhelm our brains, paralleling the obesity epidemic where our bodies struggle to adapt to contemporary lifestyles. However, depression is not limited to humans; it has been documented in various animal species and across diverse human societies, including small groups like the Ache of Paraguay, who lived similarly to our ancestors.
So why might depression exist in humans and other animals?
One theory gaining traction posits that depression is not a disorder but rather an adaptive response to challenging circumstances. Central to this theory is the 5HT1A receptor, which binds serotonin—a key player in depression. Research indicates that rodents lacking this receptor exhibit fewer depressive symptoms under stress, and their receptor is 99% similar to that of humans, suggesting a potential evolutionary link.
But what purpose does depression serve?
The Problem Solving Hypothesis
Some suggest depression encourages rumination—deep, analytical thinking about negative experiences. This reflective process can help individuals dissect their problems into manageable parts, akin to breaking down complex math problems. David Foster Wallace's short story, "The Depressed Person," illustrates this cycle of profound thought.
However, for effective rumination, individuals often isolate themselves from distractions and struggle to find joy in activities, which can exacerbate their symptoms. Research by Paul W. Andrews and J. Anderson Thomson Jr. shows that engaging with these thoughts through expressive therapies can alleviate depressive symptoms more effectively than standard treatments. Laboratory studies further reveal that those experiencing depression often excel at resolving intricate social dilemmas.
Yet, depression carries evolutionary drawbacks, including reduced libido and heightened suicide risk. Estimates suggest that at least 60% of those who take their own lives have a major depressive disorder, challenging the notion of depression as merely a cognitive tool.
Many researchers consider rumination theory just one perspective among several attempts to unravel the complexities of depression. Other hypotheses, like the "plea for help" or "depressive realism," explore different facets of this condition.
Thomson remarks, "To say that depression can be useful doesn’t mean it’s always going to be useful," highlighting the societal tendency to stigmatize depression while neglecting the nuances of sadness. He advocates for a more balanced approach to treatment, noting that reducing reliance on antidepressants can facilitate genuine recovery.
Supporting this view, a 2005 study by Vanderbilt psychologist Steven Hollon found that those who discontinued antidepressants had a 76% higher relapse rate within a year compared to those who underwent cognitive therapy, which had a 31% relapse rate.
The landscape of mental health research remains complicated, with many findings open to interpretation. Joe Forgas, a social psychologist, has shown that negative moods can enhance decision-making in complex scenarios, lending credence to this hypothesis.
The Immune Response Hypothesis
Another evolutionary perspective on depression relates to the immune system. A 2012 study by Dr. Andrew Miller and Dr. Charles Raison suggested that certain genetic variations linked to depression may also bolster immune responses to infections. Dr. Miller noted, "Most of the genetic variations that have been linked to depression turn out to affect the function of the immune system," while Dr. Raison emphasized that these adaptations were crucial for survival in ancestral environments.
Historically, infections were leading causes of infant mortality, but advances in medicine have drastically reduced these rates. The gene NPY, associated with inflammation and immunity, shows a correlation with major depressive disorder in contemporary populations.
Drs. Miller and Raison propose that acute stress can trigger both depression and immune responses, as our ancestors faced injuries that often led to infections. Those with the mutated NPY gene were more likely to survive and pass on this trait, further linking depression and immune function.
Research has explored the use of anti-inflammatory drugs like infliximab for treatment-resistant depression, though results have varied. The findings suggest that while chronic stress may weaken immunity, evolution might have provided mechanisms to mitigate some of these immune deficiencies.
Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD) may also have evolutionary roots, as it reportedly reduces women's libido during winter months when child survival rates drop.
The Creativity Hypothesis
A closely related theory to the rumination hypothesis explores the connection between depression and creativity. Neuroscientist Nancy Andreasen found that 80% of writers surveyed from the Iowa Writer’s Workshop met criteria for depression. Further studies by Kay Redfield Jamison revealed that creatives are significantly more likely to experience mood disorders.
Andreasen posits that the cognitive style associated with depression can foster creativity, though she acknowledges the inherent suffering that often accompanies this state of mind. Edgar Allan Poe famously mused on the thin line between madness and intelligence, highlighting the complex relationship between mental states and creative output.
Despite the fascination with the "mad genius" archetype, Jamison cautions that not all individuals with mood disorders possess extraordinary creativity, nor do all artists experience mood fluctuations.
The struggles faced by creative individuals may also contribute to this correlation, as many navigate economic hardships and societal rejection.
In Conclusion
Research on mental illness is still in its early stages, hindered by stigma and underreporting. While much of the current understanding remains theoretical, ongoing studies are gradually clarifying the complex interplay of factors contributing to depression. Intriguingly, even our suffering may have evolutionary significance.