The Unidentified Anomalous Phenomenon is not merely a superficial interest; it may be intricately woven into the essence of our reality.

Quoting Manly P. Hall, “when humanity comprehends the language of symbolism, a great veil shall lift from the minds of men.” Our thoughts communicate through symbols, revealing memes and archetypes. Words themselves are symbols, constructed from smaller symbols. If this ‘language’ transcends mere programming and becomes the lens through which we perceive everything, then ‘spelling’ acquires both magical and technological dimensions. Ensnared in the traps of language imposed by others, we inadvertently bind ourselves and one another. The word 'veil' is an anagram for 'evil,' suggesting an ominous undertone. What is truly unfolding here?

The Phenomenon presents a multitude of converging themes, making it unlikely for any single individual to connect them all. Listening to one attempting to piece it together might remind you of Alfred Wegener proposing continental drift when many believed in a static, flat Earth.

This serves as a sardonic commentary on both science and the flat Earth movement, illustrating how we all, myself included, often cling to our comforting worldviews. The term ‘Weltanschauung’—meaning worldview—suggests that your opinions may be as insignificant as a pair of dimes if you face backlash for diverging from popular beliefs.

But why are our opinions seemingly worth only two cents?

The world around us is not as it appears. It is certainly not what we are led to believe. The quest for clarity in this confusing environment is one of my greatest challenges. We are enveloped in a narrative of fiction. Every day, we encounter countless advertisements, memes, thoughts, jingles, and structural reinforcements—an intricate web that goes beyond mere enforcement.

So, are the purveyors of this fiction entertainers or insidious manipulators? Could they be both? Some individuals may embody kindness, while others may display hostility, and some may possess traits of both. I’ve had my share of moments, though I generally lean toward peacefulness.

Am I merely a substitute writer? A scab?! In an era where traditional journalism is overshadowed by podcasters and the unregulated internet, the landscape of communication is transforming.

This situation is chaotic. The old contracts are dissolving. Once, we knew whom to idolize—celebrities who entertained us in exchange for our patronage. Their influence is waning as they stray into the political realm, where we already have enough clowns.

But perhaps it’s all just playful language. Maybe labeling our elected representatives as the El, or the Elohim, isn’t entirely fair. If we elected them, isn’t that our responsibility?

I sense that something is amiss…

Many concepts explored in this piece draw from Jordan Maxwell and the recent work “Decoding Clown World with Kali,” both of which are linked in the recommended section. My struggle lies not in amplifying the ‘other’ or ‘them’—this legion of clowns—as inherently malicious.

Perhaps I should first confront the question of whether evil exists. This has been a struggle for many, including myself.

I have an aversion to clowns. In fact, their presence is unsettling. When I hear of alien encounters involving Greys appearing as clowns, it troubles me more than if they manifested as reptilian beings. Yet, we are left with only two archetypes: clowns or jokers.

Jesus, suffering on the cross, or Buddha, laughing. Both signify a reality beyond our comprehension.

Some scientists, increasingly convinced by emerging evidence and mathematics, propose we inhabit a simulation. I find this concept appealing. In “The Matrix,” Morpheus poses the question to Neo, “Is that air you’re breathing?”

Morpheus, in Greco-Roman mythos, is a son of Hypnos, the god of sleep, who brings human forms to dreamers, while his siblings present animals and inanimate objects.

Why does Hypnos, the personification of sleep, urge Neo to awaken? Why does he encourage him to fight? Are morphai real? Are they archetypes? Are they merely avatars for souls? Am I the dreamer crafting these figures, or is Morpheus another participant in this scenario?

“To suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, or to take arms against a sea of troubles and by opposing, end them.”

Can you perceive the struggles we face? Does taking up arms alleviate difficulties or merely create more? If they are avatars, my actions may hold little weight. Yet, I must grapple with the force beyond mere avatars. If souls exist and do not perish, I remain ensnared by an unresolved dilemma. If we cannot find common ground, does that mean progress is unattainable?

There is no distinction between a computer simulation theory and a consciousness-first paradigm. Users are indistinguishable within either framework. Each individual serves as a reference point of interaction; everything we do generates equal and opposite reactions, rippling out and returning. As all nodes illuminate the playing field, they become interconnected, or entangled.

We embody the stars in constellations.

We are born into family systems, a psychological perspective known as systems theory, where every individual receives scripts or roles to enact within their family. No two individuals enter the same family environment. Each new addition alters the family dynamic, reinforcing the roles of others. Just as you cannot step into the same river twice, you cannot inhabit the same family as the previous generation.

Our cultures, families, and belief systems—whether academic or religious—provide us with our narratives. Your script is your ‘scripture.’ The language we employ binds us. Deviating from the script may lead to a judge imposing a new ‘sentence’ that binds you further.

With this context in mind, we return to the question: are fiction agents inherently negative? Did your family deceive you about Christmas and Santa Claus? Did you perpetuate the myth with your children and grandchildren? Do you partake in this annual deception with family and friends? If excluded from these celebrations, do you feel despondent, despite knowing the truth?

I feel apprehensive about the possibility of falling off my chair…

Recognizing that you are a ‘soul’ player in a virtual game can be liberating, especially when you acknowledge that no debt, karma, dharma, or obligation exists to follow any specific rules. You have not failed or sinned, even if others would have you believe otherwise.

The term ‘sin’ originally referred to missing the mark, particularly in archery. Sin, sine, and signatures—like repaying a loan already settled—constitute the binding spell of legal documents, even though what you sign may become irrelevant in a century. Have you ever pondered why it’s termed ‘repaying’ a loan? Repaying implies an earlier payment; from a religious standpoint, Christ has settled all debts, yet the clowns still demand payment.

Thus, upon immediate reflection, no single individual or agency is out to harm you. We often volunteer for our own troubles. Certainly, some challenges in life seek us out, just as Morpheus sought Neo. Ultimately, what you pursue also seeks you.

Imagine everyone around you is asleep. We aren’t merely participants in a game or simulation; we are in a dream. Morpheus’s role is to hypnotize you, to keep you in slumber, while simultaneously wishing to awaken you. An abrupt awakening can lead to anger and a desire to return to sleep.

Incremental awakening, however, allows individuals to rise in stages of heightened awareness, resulting in a refreshed and renewed state. This serves as a reminder that you were already in those states and will return to them, like a sign wave ebbing and flowing across a level field. We are the Phoenix, perpetually rising from ashes. We are dolphins, soaring in one moment and exploring the depths in another. We are creations of God—whether in the traditional sense of offspring or as beings conceived in divine imagination, exploring various scenarios in relation to the concept of duality. Suffering is not desired by God any more than nightmares are desired by those who dream.

If we are the dreamers of dreams and the characters are reflections of ourselves, then if we conjure our own nightmares, are we not responsible for the suffering of those characters?

Do these agents willingly take on their roles?

If we agree to enter this existence, we are born into families and cultures. There is no distinction between family and national origins. Define nation as you will—culture, family, state, or regime. The journey of life necessitates growth and individuation from family and cultural norms. As adults, we leave home, and similarly, we transcend our cultural beliefs. Aeneas rose from the ruins of Troy to establish Rome.

The ideal family comprises two individuals from distinct backgrounds uniting to create something novel. There are additional layers of games built atop this primary one.

Games like Risk and Monopoly conclude when one player dominates them all. Ultimately, the game resets. Theoretically, we could abandon this planet and initiate a new game elsewhere, but why pursue that when there are more engaging games to play?

And I ponder how I’ll descend the stairs…

For a glimpse into documented oddities, a simple search will suffice. Fortunately, someone has already undertaken this task. If you read the following book, it would constitute research: The Complete Writings of Charles Fort: The Book of the Damned, New Lands, Lo!, and Wild Talents is my first recommendation, followed by Mind Programming by Eldon Taylor.

Both works uniquely illustrate that the world is not what we perceive it to be. The first book catalogues many instances of strangeness—not limited to UFOs but UAPs! While UFOs refer to flying objects, those who have engaged with the Phenomenon understand it encompasses more than mere aerial phenomena; interdimensional beings emerge as a possibility.

Congress is currently discussing interdimensional entities. If consciousness exists and there’s no real mind-body connection, then consciousness itself overlaps with the physical realm. Your existence affirms the existence of others. You know from your dreams that others dwell within you. Psychological studies reveal the existence of others through brain hemisphere severance and exploration of archetypes.

There are others. Many archetypes may be distortions—clowns.

Label them ships, aliens, ghosts, non-corporeal beings, clowns, jokers, hitchhikers, archetypes, demons, jinn, poltergeists, or AI avatars. I cannot dismiss any of these terms; perhaps distinctions remain to be drawn. Yet, it’s evident some entities register on our radar while others feel more personal or spiritual.

Whether in games or consciousness, forces beyond our control influence us. Similar to how we willingly watch horror films or visit haunted houses, we often seek out fear or entertainment, without harboring resentment towards those who create it. Instead, we applaud them.

A dream devoid of interaction would be exceedingly dull—an infinite tiled floor with no artifacts to engage with. Even within infinity, our horizon remains limited by our perception.

Perhaps Stealers Wheel had it right: we begin with nothing and gradually become self-made. Our language shapes us more than the ideas of others. Some prioritize external opinions over their own. Certainly, there are those who wish to bind us with their words, expectations, and will impose restrictions if we consent.

Are relationships and bindings infinite?

If you lived a thousand lives and died, which of those individuals would be your parents? How many have you had? How many partners and children have you known? The woman who told Jesus, “I have no husband,” was essentially stating, “I have no singular husband,” as she had five in this lifetime and likely many more across lifetimes. To whom should she respond? Are celebrities obliged to all their fans across time? If you lived a million lives, do you owe allegiance to everyone? Can you feel so divided? Do we require them, or do they require us? “Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right…”

Here I stand. What will you make of me? What will I make of myself?

Attempting to decipher it all, I remain uncertain of what it is, but I am confident that none of this aligns with what I’ve been told. My desire for knowledge is not solely for personal freedom but to assist others in finding liberation as well. The world is not what we believe it to be, yet the pursuit of understanding is a worthy and essential endeavor. Our beliefs, whether right or wrong, shape our reality. Regardless of their validity, we act upon and build upon our belief systems.

If I consider how my perceptions of others bind them to me as an active force, then as Michael Jackson’s song “Man in the Mirror” suggests, liberating myself first breaks the chains of agency for all. While we may escape the cave of Plato, the responsibility to step into the light and adapt remains ours. Those who linger in the cave will reconstruct their bonds.

For those who venture beyond the cave, will they discover freedom or merely another tier of an expanding cave system to navigate?

Recommended: