Do Cells Have Infinite Lifespans?

In the early 20th century, the prevailing belief about vertebrate cells was that they could potentially live forever under optimal conditions. It was thought that as long as a culture of these cells received sufficient nutrients and was maintained in suitable environments, they would continue to thrive and divide for many years, possibly decades or even centuries.

This notion was bolstered by Alexis Carrel, a surgeon who won a Nobel Prize for his innovative work in vascular sutures. Carrel was intrigued by cellular aging and claimed that he had a culture of chicken heart cells that had survived for 34 years in a glass flask, despite the fact that a chicken typically lives only 5 to 10 years.

However, this claim was met with skepticism, as other researchers were unable to replicate his results. Eventually, Hayflick and his colleague Paul Moorhead countered Carrel’s assertions, demonstrating that cells could only divide a finite number of times—typically between 40 and 60—before entering a state of senescence, or aging. This limit, now recognized in biology, is generally around 72 divisions for most human cells.

This implies that the majority of cells in your body are no more than 72 divisions removed from the initial fertilized egg that developed into you. The Hayflick limit is linked to telomeres, which are repetitive DNA sequences at the ends of chromosomes. Each time a cell divides, the mechanisms that replicate DNA cannot fully copy the ends, resulting in the gradual shortening of telomeres. After a certain number of replications, telomeres become too short for replication to continue, halting cell division.

What About Carrel’s Chicken Cells?

Despite the acceptance of the Hayflick limit, questions linger about Carrel’s chicken heart cells that thrived for over three decades. How did those cells continue to grow despite what should have been telomere exhaustion?

Several theories have emerged:

1. New Cell Introduction: Carrel supplemented the cells with a nutrient solution daily, likely derived from chickens, which might have contained new cells capable of integrating into the existing culture. Thus, while the original cells may have perished, the introduction of new cells could give the impression of longevity.
2. Pluripotent Stem Cells: There exists an exception to the Hayflick limit: stem cells. These cells produce an enzyme known as telomerase, which can restore shortened telomeres. If Carrel's experiment began with stem cells destined to develop into heart muscle, they might have maintained active telomerase, preserving their telomeres longer than typical cells.

Ultimately, however, other researchers were unable to replicate Carrel's findings, leading to a consensus that Hayflick and Moorhead were correct: cells have a finite lifespan determined by their telomere length.

Implications for Human Longevity

The unfortunate reality is that aging is embedded in our cells. Even if we zoom in on a single cell within our bodies, it will eventually exhaust its telomeres and cease replication.

Yet, there are exceptions. Take red blood cells, for example: how do we continually produce new ones if cells can only divide a limited number of times? The answer lies in stem cells, which persist in our bodies even into adulthood. These stem cells sidestep the Hayflick limit by utilizing telomerase to extend their telomeres. When these stem cells divide, one daughter cell remains a stem cell, while the other differentiates into a specific cell type.

Moreover, not all cells in a given tissue are at the same stage of division. In the liver, for instance, some cells may be on their 72nd division, while others may only be at 40 or 50, creating a mosaic of cell ages. This diversity may be beneficial for restoring damaged or aged organs, as some cells retain the ability to divide further when needed.

This discovery opens intriguing possibilities for longevity research: could telomerase supplements enable us to live indefinitely? Unfortunately, the answer is likely negative for several reasons:

1. Cellular Barriers: Telomerase is not efficiently transported across cellular membranes, meaning that supplements may not effectively reach all cells.
2. Underlying Aging Issues: Most aging-related problems are not merely a result of depleted cells. Enhancing replication does not necessarily address the broader issues associated with aging.
3. Cancer Risks: Introducing telomerase indiscriminately may lead to uncontrollable cell growth, which is synonymous with cancer. Current research on telomerase often aims to inhibit the enzyme to combat tumor growth.

In conclusion, the replication of our cells is inherently limited, and this limitation is beneficial. The Hayflick limit arose from challenging the belief in cell immortality, revealing that most cells cannot replicate indefinitely due to telomere shortening. While stem cells can counteract this limitation, promoting unchecked cell proliferation can lead to cancerous growth.

To extend our lives, we must ensure that our tissues can regenerate damaged cells and organs, but we should avoid triggering unlimited growth. The Hayflick limit clarifies which cells can be long-lived and which should have a predetermined lifespan. And if you encounter a supplement claiming to lengthen telomeres, it’s best to steer clear!

If you found this exploration interesting, consider sharing it on Twitter and tagging me @swestreich with your thoughts.