Navigating the Decision to Halt Corporate Ventures: Insights
Written on
Understanding When to Cease Investment
In any corporate venturing initiative, a crucial element influencing financial returns is the capacity to withdraw from projects that are unlikely to yield positive results or bear significance for the parent organization, regardless of their potential success. Below, we explore a series of critical questions to consider when assessing your portfolio of new ventures.
Section 1.1 Identifying Market Competition
- A competitor has launched a solution addressing the same problem.
The market landscape can shift rapidly, with other entities identifying similar challenges and seizing opportunities in ways that can render your offering less appealing, if not obsolete. It's essential to recognize that few new ventures, whether initiated by corporations or startups, are truly unique in identifying a problem worth solving. For instance, in the realm of content streaming, while platforms like Spotify and Pandora have thrived, many others, such as Rdio and Grooveshark, failed to gain traction.
Section 1.2 Pricing and Product Quality Challenges
- Customers report that a more affordable or lower-quality product suffices.
In the nascent stages of many product categories, small sales volumes can complicate unit economics. Consequently, a new product must be compelling enough for consumers to spend their money on it. However, achieving such a distinct advantage can be quite challenging. Competitors might have different pricing strategies or cost structures that allow them to offer lower prices profitably. A notable example is Costco's "Kirkland" brand, which spans a wide range of products and poses significant competition to established consumer goods companies.
Section 1.3 The Risk of Standards Wars
- A significant client has adopted a technological standard that we cannot accommodate.
Standards wars can be detrimental for companies that find themselves on the losing side. Sony’s defeat to VHS and Circuit City’s $330 million investment in promoting a DVD alternative, DIVX, illustrate this point. Similarly, while Blu-ray, supported by Samsung and others, emerged victorious over HD-DVD, its dominance was overshadowed by the rise of streaming services. If you sense that you're not aligned with the winning technology in a standards battle, it may be time to reconsider your investment.
Section 1.4 Intellectual Property Considerations
- We lack the means to safeguard the intellectual property created during this project.
As barriers to entry diminish, protecting intellectual property remains a vital strategy for maintaining a competitive edge. Without the ability to claim ownership of an idea, you risk signaling to competitors that there is an unprotected market ripe for exploitation. A poignant example is the fidget spinner, initially conceived by Catherine Hettinger. After failing to generate sales and allowing her patent to lapse, the idea was quickly seized upon by other entrepreneurs, resulting in a proliferation of knock-offs.
Section 1.5 Alignment with Strategic Goals
- Our strategy has evolved, making this project a poor fit.
A project that aligns with one strategic vision may become misaligned under a different framework. Nokia’s near demise, as it faced the rise of smartphones, led to the sale of its handset division to Microsoft and a pivot towards networking and telecom infrastructure. Although Nokia still operates in the phone sector, its revival hinges on focusing on 5G technology.
Section 1.6 Financial Constraints
- Funding for this project has been exhausted.
Companies often face tough decisions regarding which ventures to continue and which to terminate. Even those with substantial resources can find that the costs of a project, regardless of its feasibility, can become unsustainable. A case in point is Google's Loon Internet Balloon project, which, despite impressive technical achievements over nine years, struggled to achieve commercial viability and reportedly burned through $100 million annually.
In summary, these questions provide a framework for assessing whether it’s prudent to continue with a venture. Remember, the decision to halt an initiative before further resources are wasted is a brave and necessary choice.