Navigating Flutter's Challenges on Windows: A Deep Dive
Written on
Chapter 1: A Flutter Enthusiast's Perspective
As an avid supporter of Flutter, I have often found myself abandoning almost completed projects in other programming languages, opting instead to recreate them using Flutter. I genuinely believe that this framework provides the simplest pathway to transform my app ideas into reality. My enthusiasm has led me to publish articles and create various content centered around Flutter's capabilities.
With that said, my excitement grew when Flutter reached a stable version for Windows. Historically, Windows development has lagged behind, with many applications being built on Electron or as Progressive Web Apps rather than as native programs. Having experienced Flutter on both Android and iOS, I appreciated its consistent quality. The user interface layout and the engaging "Widget of the Week" videos captivated me. Yet, at the beginning of 2022, I still perceived Windows support as experimental, anticipating a lengthy journey before it achieved full stability.
When I refer to Flutter's "stable experience parity" as an issue, I mean that while platforms like iOS and Android offer a genuinely robust experience, the situation differs entirely for Windows. Despite significant efforts to enhance Flutter for Windows, the experience remains unexpectedly rough and under-documented.
Chapter 2: The Reality of Flutter on Windows
If your goal is to create a straightforward application without needing deep integration with Windows features, you might find Flutter for Windows functional. However, once you apply the stable label, we should be able to use Flutter for Windows just as seamlessly as we do on other supported platforms.
When comparing Flutter's implementations on mobile versus Windows, several critical areas are noticeably lacking in the Windows environment: - Plugin development necessitates knowledge of C++, whereas C#/.NET should be more appropriate for Windows. - Integrating native C++ libraries requires familiarity with both C++ and CMake. - Native exceptions often lead to crashes on desktop applications, whereas they typically do not cause mobile apps to exit unexpectedly. - Documentation on these topics is sparse, with only minimal commentary on the CMake build process found in CMakeLists.txt files. - Android and iOS produce installable packages for devices, while Windows builds generate multiple files that require manual packaging.
This inconsistency leads to a perception that Flutter on mobile is "truly stable," whereas the desktop experience is markedly different.
Section 2.1: The Complexity of Platform-Specific Development
Most Flutter applications leverage either the core framework's functionality or use plugins. If you're developing something simple, like a calculator, you might not need any additional packages. However, for more complex functionalities—like switching modes and saving user preferences—you will likely need a package such as shared_preferences.
These packages include "platform implementations" that handle specific actions on the native platform. "Platform channels" then facilitate communication between your cross-platform Flutter code and these specific implementations.
When existing packages do not meet your needs, you may find yourself creating your own. While this process works well for Android and iOS using Java, Kotlin, Swift, or Objective-C, Windows presents challenges. Ideally, developers should utilize .NET for Windows due to its balance of usability and performance, along with the availability of numerous NuGet packages—currently over 281,000. Unfortunately, Flutter apps targeting Windows are essentially Win32 applications, necessitating C++ for platform-specific code, which significantly limits available resources and support.
Section 2.2: Documentation and Support Issues
Consider trying to write a Flutter app for Windows that requires a specific platform function, but there's no existing plugin. You may initially find ample documentation for Android and iOS, but Windows support is lacking. After some digging, you might discover outdated or incomplete resources.
Once you set up a basic plugin, the process of implementing your desired functionality can become convoluted and error-prone. Although projects like Pigeon aim to simplify type-safe bindings, they currently only support Android and iOS. As you delve deeper into your plugin's native code, you may find yourself lost in a lack of guidance.
Debugging can also be frustrating. If your plugin throws a native exception, the app may crash without offering clear insights into the issue. Developers often need to use Visual Studio to attach a debugger manually, a process that isn't straightforward and lacks comprehensive documentation.
Section 2.3: The CMake Conundrum
Another hurdle is understanding CMake, which is essential for building Flutter applications on Windows. Many developers find themselves bewildered by CMake's complexity and the insufficient documentation available. This lack of clarity can severely hinder the development process, especially for those accustomed to simpler build systems.
The expectation that developers should have a solid grasp of C++ and CMake to accomplish basic tasks feels excessive. While learning platform-specific nuances is part of cross-platform development, the barriers presented by CMake can deter many from fully embracing Flutter on Windows.
What Lies Ahead?
Despite these challenges, I remain optimistic about Flutter's future in software development. I believe it will continue to evolve and become the preferred tool for many developers. However, the disparity between the experiences of building for mobile versus Windows is significant.
My experience with creating a Windows app in Flutter has been a learning curve. While I have faced numerous obstacles—such as integrating libraries and navigating CMake—I have gained valuable insights along the way. In the future, I aim to document these experiences, producing articles and videos to assist others.
Yet, I'm concerned that newcomers may mistakenly view Flutter for Windows as being on par with mobile app development, only to become frustrated by the stark differences. It's crucial to acknowledge that Flutter for Windows, although stable in the sense that it functions, still feels like a second-class option compared to its mobile counterparts. The process of writing plugins, debugging, and working with CMake remains cumbersome.
As Flutter for Windows matures, it would benefit greatly from a dedicated community leader to provide documentation and guidance on the intricacies of the platform. Although the native software landscape for Windows remains sparse, I am confident that Flutter will emerge as a strong contender in the coming years. For now, I'm eager to continue my journey with Flutter, even as I navigate the complexities of CMake.