Part 1: Identifying the Missing Element in Economics

At first glance, the logic underpinning capitalism seems straightforward. Individuals have needs and the ability to produce goods, leading them to create products that others want, typically exchanging them for currency.

Theoretically, this process is based on voluntarism; if the perceived costs outweigh the benefits, individuals would refrain from entering transactions. However, the crux of the issue arises from what is defined as costs and benefits. Economists often focus exclusively on quantifiable resources, neglecting the broader implications of their actions.

While resources are undeniably vital, they do not encompass the full picture. The other critical aspect involves what we term externalities—costs and benefits that materialize post-transaction but are not reflected in market dynamics. To illustrate this concept, consider the following example:

Imagine I operate a plastics factory and invest $1,000 in raw materials and $200 in production costs, ultimately selling the product for $3,000. At a glance, this seems like a lucrative endeavor, yielding an $1,800 profit.

However, if the waste from this manufacturing process contaminates a nearby water source, it could result in health issues for local residents, estimated at $2,000, plus an additional $500 in environmental damage. In reality, my operation would result in a net loss of $700 when considering these external costs. Yet, because these health and ecological impacts are not accounted for, they remain unaddressed.

This highlights a significant flaw in our current economic frameworks: they focus solely on production and distribution, sidelining human welfare. As such, many of the pressing issues we face—poverty, hunger, labor rights violations, and the climate crisis—are compounded by a failure to consider the human costs involved.

Part 2: Addressing Externalities—The Challenge of Implementation

Recognizing the root of the problem is a positive step, but it does not necessarily lead to solutions. The challenge lies in effectively managing these externalities. Historically, the approach has been to implement taxes on detrimental activities while providing subsidies for beneficial ones, as proposed by economist Arthur Pigou.

While this method appears straightforward, it is fraught with complications. It is heavily dependent on political leadership, which can vary dramatically, particularly during crises. Moreover, even with consistent political will, there exists a knowledge gap; governments often lack the comprehensive data needed to tackle externalities adequately.

Externalities can manifest in numerous unforeseen ways, and attempting to account for them all would lead to overwhelming bureaucratic processes and increased state intervention—something we must be wary of.

Thus, we face the challenge of finding a market-based solution to enforce accountability for externalities. However, enforcing any measure within a capitalist framework requires leverage. To compel a corporation to compensate for environmental damage, one must possess the necessary influence to enforce compliance. Unfortunately, the legal system is inherently skewed; those with greater financial resources can afford better legal representation and prolong legal battles, leaving ordinary citizens at a disadvantage.

How can we enforce accountability for externalities within the existing market structure? While I wish I had a definitive answer, I can only suggest that this contradiction seems to be an intrinsic aspect of the system, necessitating significant modifications for effective implementation—or perhaps a complete overhaul of the system itself.

Final Thoughts

Our contemporary challenges are complex and varied. Despite the diversity of these crises, a common thread unites them: the inadequacy of modern economic principles. The results produced by these models are fundamentally flawed, perpetuating a cultural narrative that neglects human welfare.

We often compartmentalize resources and well-being, failing to recognize their interconnectedness. Picture them as two adjacent flower pots; over the years, we have nurtured one while disregarding the other. Now, as the neglected flower withers and begins to decompose, it threatens the health of the other. We're only just starting to realize the damage, while the solution lies just beyond our line of sight—if only we were willing to look.

If you find this topic engaging, follow me on Medium for further discussions! Not a member yet? Click here to sign up!

An Injustice!

A new intersectional publication, geared towards voices, values, and identities!

aninjusticemag.com

Explore the concepts of underfitting and overfitting in economics, contrasting these ideas with our understanding of right and wrong.

Adam Robinson discusses his insights as an advisor to some of the world's largest hedge funds and family offices, shedding light on economic strategies.