Understanding Sympathy for Those with Erroneous Beliefs
Written on
Chapter 1: The Weight of Historical Insight
Throughout history, figures like Galileo Galilei (1564-1642), Isaac Newton (1642-1726 or 1727), and Charles Darwin (1809-1882) have inspired me. Their revolutionary ideas emerged from challenging widely accepted facts, which were often dictated by the educational systems, literature, and prevailing intellectuals of their times. These truths were frequently enforced by powerful institutions, sometimes with dire consequences.
These trailblazers did not merely possess extraordinary intelligence; rather, they exhibited a courageous questioning spirit that many others did not. It is vital to understand that anyone can question established norms; all it requires is curiosity and a willingness to engage in research or experimentation. Sadly, few people take this step, and even fewer dedicate their lives to it.
While I specifically named three men, countless others—including women, minorities, and individuals from various countries—have also made significant contributions.
I do feel a degree of empathy for groups such as climate change deniers, the January 6th insurrectionists, QAnon supporters, anti-vaccine advocates, and Christian nationalists. This empathy does not equate to acceptance; those who break the law must face consequences.
Section 1.1: The Influence of Misinformation
It's important to recognize that the media these individuals consume presents their beliefs as facts. The literature they read, the statements from elected officials—including the President—, and the sermons from their religious leaders all reinforce these misguided views. Furthermore, alternative opinions are often dismissed, leading to a tightly-knit community that supports these delusions. The leadership within these groups is often characterized by charisma, emotional appeals, and a focus on fear rather than rational discourse.
They have been misled, often by those they should have been able to trust. In environments where everyone around them asserts a particular belief, it becomes incredibly challenging to consider that an alternative perspective might hold validity.
Section 1.2: The Role of Education in Belief Formation
Their educational experiences have often been inadequate. Education should cultivate critical thinking and a culture of inquiry, emphasizing experimentation and research. Personally, I thrived academically because I sought out effective learning methods. Traditional lectures were not my forte; I learned best through reading, questioning, and hands-on experimentation.
One of my life's highlights was collaborating on a problem with Richard Feynman, only to later realize that our understanding was flawed. We were trying to decipher a magic trick without considering the possibility of deception.
Chapter 2: Questions for Reflection
In the video "The Sin of Empathy | Doug Wilson and Joe Rigney," the speakers discuss the balance between understanding and condoning misguided beliefs.
Brené Brown's video on "Empathy vs Sympathy" offers insights into the differences between these two emotional responses and their implications.
As you reflect on these themes, consider the following questions:
- What learning methods work best for you?
- What assumptions or beliefs have you explored recently?
- Who do you trust for answers to your questions, and what qualifies them?
- Have you examined alternative explanations for your beliefs?
- Do you document your discoveries to reinforce your learning?
- Are the messages you receive more emotional or rational in nature?
Remember, practicing stoicism doesn’t mean ignoring emotions; it’s about ensuring that emotions do not overshadow reason—an invaluable skill that can be developed.