The issue of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) and UFOs has increasingly captured public attention, yet the question remains: why isn't Congress pressing agencies like the Pentagon and NASA for clarity? Who truly governs the United States?

It's not merely speculation from sources like Politico or figures such as Jacques Vallée, Gary Nolan, Haim Eshed, Robert Bigelow, or John Greenewald Jr.; government records obtained via FOIA requests affirm that humanity has encountered evidence suggesting UFOs may be of alien origin or not human at all. Pioneers in UFO research like Allen Hynek, Stanton Friedman, and Dr. John E. Mack represented the last wave of serious inquiry. Will any contemporary scientists rise to fill their shoes?

In an illuminating discussion on Theories of Everything with Curt Jaimungal, John Greenewald Jr. emphasizes a troubling point: every piece of photographic evidence concerning UFOs has been denied in FOIA requests, including those made public since 2017. The recent footage presented by Kirkpatrick to the Senate and NASA's UFO committee was collected by the military, yet all sensitive information was excised.

Why is this sensitive data not simply redacted?

I have previously raised this issue: why can't the government crop or obscure sensitive parts of the information and provide the data we seek? The claim that they are unable to manipulate the data is a blatant falsehood. Such obfuscation is so extreme that even Congress members are submitting FOIA requests for information they should be able to access without impediment.

Where are the scientists advocating for transparency from the government? The NASA committee has made it abundantly clear that they will selectively choose the civilian data to consider, which is not how science operates. To cherry-pick data, one must have a comprehensive initial dataset to discern what constitutes credible evidence.

Moreover, if Kirkpatrick and others acknowledge that military data collection surpasses public efforts, it raises concerns about the responsible use of taxpayer funds in this endeavor.

Unless they have already reviewed substantial evidence and are deliberately concealing it, it seems plausible that they are collaborating in maintaining the secrecy surrounding this issue. Another possibility is that they remain so burdened by stigma that they refuse to engage with historical data, including government documents now accessible to civilians.

This suggests that John Greenewald Jr. possesses a wealth of civilian data. Is the NASA UFO committee engaging with him?

Wasting Time and Taxpayer Resources, Again… How much longer will the public tolerate the military and NASA squandering our time with pseudo-science and committees that seem more interested in prolonging the status quo than in genuine inquiry?

No scientific assessment is necessary to conclude that if the government has an extraterrestrial craft stored in Area 51, specifically in Hangar 18, it should be acknowledged.

Bejamin Robert Rich (June 18, 1925 — January 5, 1995), the second director of Lockheed's Skunk Works from 1975 to 1991, succeeded its founder, Kelly Johnson. Known as the "father of stealth," Rich led the development of the F-117, the first production stealth aircraft, and contributed to the F-104, U-2, SR-71, A-12, and F-22, among others, many of which remain classified.

ET UFO Are Real: Ben Rich Lockheed CEO Admitted in His Deathbed Confession August 31, 2010 — Ben Rich, Lockheed Skunk Works CEO, confessed before his passing that extraterrestrial UFO visitors are real and that the U.S. military travels among the stars.

In 2017, Robert Bigelow asserted that aliens exist and are present on Earth. Why is he not included in the NASA UFO committee? Is it because he isn't a scientist? Were the scientists chosen as selectively as the data they are reviewing?

Is Haim Eshed a scientist? Why isn't he part of the NASA UFO committee? Why hasn't he been interviewed? I sincerely hope he isn't being marginalized for his statements while others lament being scrutinized for pursuing scientific inquiry.

If any reputable individual has faced harassment since John E. Mack, it seems it would be Haim Eshed.

Why wasn't Dr. Gary Nolan invited to join the NASA UFO committee? Can NASA's panel not speak with him?

Could the panel converse with retired Commander and Top Gun pilot David Fravor? Retired U.S. Navy Lieutenant Commander Alex Dietrich could accompany him! Granted, they are military personnel. Dr. Diana Walsh Pasulka has gathered insights through her research on civilian UFOs… Could we not have the panel engage with her? To her credit, she is upfront about her academic limits and may decline participation, but this quality should actually qualify her.

A thorough historical analysis of science must encompass a broad spectrum, tracing back to Francis Bacon, the originator of the scientific method. Science cannot advance without a comprehensive historical backdrop and societal context. One could not effectively apply Occam’s Razor or reference Galileo without this context.

No UFO or alien theory can progress without recognizing the rich history that accompanies it. Medicine cannot effectively cure or remedy ailments if symptoms are ignored. While some symptoms may not correlate with a diagnosis, overlooking all of them risks missing a co-morbid issue that complicates the patient's condition.

From a psychological and illness model, as illustrated in Carl Jung's UFO writings, Flying Saucers: A Modern Myth of Things Seen in the Skies (1979), we observe a legitimate scientist wrestling with the UFO phenomenon. If this occurrence were a virus, it would be treated as an incredibly contagious contagion, affecting every part of the globe in just a few years.

This phenomenon emerged prominently following the first nuclear weapons test, showing a notable correlation, akin to striking a beehive with a rock. Although evidence suggests these encounters date back much further, they might have taken issue with humanity's dealings with weapons of mass destruction.

I find myself in agreement with this perspective. Weapons of mass destruction inflict harm on everyone: civilians, children, nature, and innocent bystanders. Could it be that any extraterrestrial visitation implies a disapproval of militaristic agendas that contradict the greater good? Does this explain the U.S. military's reluctance to disclose information? Are UFOs advocating for peace while the U.S. government resists?

I am not implying that UFOs, or the pursuit of peace, are akin to a contagion; however, some at Skinwalker Ranch suggest the Hitchhiker effect resembles this phenomenon, as it spreads from individuals who encounter it into their communities. This influence extends from them to their children, their peers in school, and beyond. The full extent of this reach remains unknown due to scientists' refusal to examine the data.

If spreading peace were as easy as propagating war, we would have achieved it by now.

Even in Jung's attempts to comprehend this issue, he poses some crucial questions. The most significant one, if one reads his entire book, is: if the phenomenon is archetypal, how does the human psyche resonate with it?

This is a question that NASA scientists seem unwilling to tackle. Why? Firstly, they aren't performing even the most basic literature reviews. Secondly, addressing this question would undoubtedly open Pandora's box, introducing a host of Psi explanations and theories that they have sought to suppress since distancing themselves from spirituality. Thirdly, reintroducing psychological models, archetypes, and the collective unconscious would necessitate rethinking statements attributed to Ben Rich, who claimed we possess the technology to take ET home.

Nugget Four: When Rich was asked how UFO propulsion operates, he replied, “Let me ask you. How does ESP work?” When the questioner responded with, “All points in time and space are connected?” Rich replied, “That’s how it works!”

This implies that history and science have significantly harmed humanity by neglecting the greatest inventor in human history, Nikola Tesla.

"The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence."

When science begins to earnestly investigate UFOs and apply technologies aligned with humanity’s highest ideals, we will see advancements in free energy, a cleaner environment, and a renewed focus on the humanities.

Recommended:

If the Government Has UFO Crash Materials, It's Time to Reveal Them AARO is charged with reviewing all non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) pertaining to UAP; evaluating all historical UAP… www.politico.com

Alien expert: They don't come in peace Malcolm Robinson is one of the leading alien experts in Britain and has authored over ten books on the subject. www.jpost.com

Father of stealth tech admits: “Extraterrestrial UFO visitors are real and the U.S. Military travel among stars”