The Internet and Democracy: A Misguided Equality Narrative
Written on
Chapter 1: The Internet's Role in Society
Recently, I came across an advertisement that proclaimed, "We need to tell and hear stories because we are human." This may seem like a simple truth about human nature, yet it is often overlooked. Humans tend to create narratives that shape our understanding of the world, sometimes mistaking these narratives for reality itself.
The Internet was designed to offer equal communication opportunities for everyone, which is a significant historical development. However, when a tool aims to provide equal chances, it inadvertently steps into the realm of democratic ideals. This is precisely what happened with the Internet's promise of democratization. While it is indeed possible for anyone with internet access to pursue their dreams, the reality is more complex.
Merely sharing your thoughts on a platform like Facebook is a far cry from actualizing your dreams or experiencing true freedom. Historically, advancements in technology have improved human existence—from the discovery of fire to the steam engine. However, information technology presents a unique challenge; it influences not just our actions but also our thought processes, often leading to a homogenization of ideas. Effective technology typically thrives on predictability among its users.
This is not inherently negative; all engines require users to adapt to their systems to reap benefits. The Internet operates similarly as a communication engine with its own set of requirements.
Section 1.1: The Internet's Growth Journey
Reflecting on the evolution of the Internet from the early 2000s to today, we can identify distinct phases.
In the early 2000s through 2012, a vision was set forth to connect everyone globally, which necessitated significant investments in infrastructure. This ambition came with a hefty price tag, leading to the rise of the digital economy. After the 2000s' speculative bubble burst, the digital economy matured and began to understand both the necessary investments and the timelines for returns. A key milestone was achieved in 2012 when Facebook surpassed one billion active users, showcasing the growing connectivity.
Section 1.2: Monetization of the Digital Space
From 2012 onward, we entered a new phase characterized by monetization. The Internet began focusing heavily on advertising, with many platforms offering free services in exchange for user engagement with ads—think of YouTube or Spotify.
There's nothing inherently wrong with companies generating revenue, as that is their primary objective. However, the initial goal of fostering communication has shifted towards serving as a means for profit. As social media consumption grows, the essence of genuine connection often becomes obscured. The founders of the Internet valued content creation, but many current users contribute little of substance to the digital landscape. Consequently, monetization has emerged as the primary metric for success.
Chapter 2: The Future of Human Interaction
The first video, "Debate: Is Social Media Undermining Democracy? | TVO Today Live," explores how social media affects democratic processes and whether it truly empowers individuals or creates a false sense of agency.
The second video, "Covering American Democracy: It's Not a Game (At Least It Shouldn't Be)," discusses the serious implications of how democracy is portrayed and practiced in the digital age.
As we look ahead, we see a world increasingly reliant on the Internet, likening its significance to that of the heart. Yet, the Internet, like all software, requires human interaction, which is often unpredictable.
This leads us to a critical juncture: should we maintain our individuality and spontaneity, or sacrifice them for the sake of a smoothly functioning digital environment? Perhaps future advancements in AI will help accommodate human unpredictability, but AI too thrives on stable inputs.
Final Thoughts: The Intersection of Technology and Democracy
What does all this imply for democracy? Observing people in public spaces reveals that many are absorbed in their devices, often mindlessly scrolling through social media. This behavior signifies a shift from active engagement to passive consumption, undermining the democratic ideal of participation.
The Internet was initially a tool for fostering communication, but it has become a purpose unto itself. While many view the digital economy as a pathway to prosperity, it demands uniform and educated users for optimal functionality.
As we stand on the brink of transformation in 2024, I cannot predict what the world will look like in 2124, but I can offer a suggestion: disconnect from the Internet for a few hours. During that time, take a moment to reflect on your thoughts and reconnect with your identity. When you return to the online world, ask yourself if you feel a sense of longing for the unique self you temporarily set aside.
Thank you for reading! If this article sparked your interest, consider following me for more insights.