The Need for Literary Criticism in a Sea of Mediocre Books
Written on
Franz Kafka once pondered why we read books, suggesting that they should disturb us deeply, akin to grief from a personal loss. He believed that literature must serve as a tool for profound emotional change, stating, "A book must be an ice-axe to break the sea frozen inside us." At the time he wrote this, Kafka was still a young man, yet he already grasped the transformative power of art.
Reflecting on moments of awe, like witnessing the grandeur of Hagia Sophia or the ancient city of Petra, reminds us that true art can evoke strong emotional responses. While my first encounter with The Brothers Karamazov didn’t bring tears, it left a lasting impact, demonstrating how literature can rearrange our thoughts and feelings.
In a world where the news cycle is relentless, it’s understandable that many seek solace in light reads or familiar favorites. However, we must consider when we last encountered a book that truly challenged us, and why such experiences are infrequent.
The Dilemma of Excessive Recommendations
If the literary world adhered to Kafka's ideals, perhaps we would see only a handful of genuinely impactful books published each year. This scenario would encourage readers to engage deeply with a few select works rather than being overwhelmed by endless recommendations.
Imagine a landscape devoid of constant new releases hailed as must-reads. Yet, in reality, sources like The New York Times inundate us with weekly updates on several new fiction titles, amounting to hundreds of recommendations annually. This flood can lead to a sense of obligation rather than joy in reading.
Mediocrity in Publishing
Despite appearances, the market is flooded with mediocre literature. Those who enjoy reading may feel pressured to keep up with the latest titles, but it’s an impossible task to stay informed about every noteworthy release while also revisiting classics.
The truth is that the majority of what’s released is subpar, a phenomenon referred to by George Steiner as the "lunatic economics of the fiction business." The pressure to constantly produce "masterpieces" often leads to the promotion of works that lack substance and merit.
In this chaotic environment, we need critics to help navigate the literary landscape. Unfortunately, the rapid pace of publishing has diminished critics to mere reviewers, who often lack the time to engage deeply with texts, resulting in superficial assessments.
The Role of Critics
The role of a critic extends beyond summarizing content; it involves inviting readers to explore and engage with literature on a deeper level. Unlike a simple review, a critical analysis fosters discussion and thought, allowing diverse interpretations to flourish.
Critics, while not always creative in the traditional sense, can still provide valuable insights that enhance our understanding of a work. However, the perception of critics as gatekeepers can undermine their purpose, leading to rigid interpretations of literature.
The Importance of Good Literary Criticism
Quality literary criticism should serve several functions: - It acts as a mentor, sharing a passion for literature with readers and encouraging inquiry. - It facilitates a connection to texts, urging readers to engage with the material rather than the author or reviewer. - It guides readers in choosing which older works to revisit, highlighting their relevance today. - It helps discover contemporary authors whose work resonates across generations.
In our digital age, the critic's role is vital in helping us navigate our reading choices and fostering a genuine appreciation for literature. Criticism should inspire readers to make independent choices rather than simply follow market trends.
Ultimately, we must seek out diverse perspectives and engage in conversations about literature, rather than passively consuming whatever is presented to us.
Further Reading:
- Harold Bloom, How to Read and Why (2001)
- Harold Bloom, Genius: A Mosaic of One Hundred Exemplary Creative Minds (2002)
- George Steiner, Tolstoy or Dostoevsky (1956)
- George Steiner, Language and Silence (1985)