Chapter 1: Concepts vs. Law

In a thought-provoking interview, filmmaker A. Konchalovsky remarked, "I, of course, am a very Russian man because I do not live by law, but by concepts." This statement invites a deeper examination of what "concepts" truly means in this context.

To grasp this notion fully, it is essential to clarify the term "concepts." For many, it often suggests a connection to a criminal context, associated with gopniks and gangsters. In contrast, ordinary individuals tend to rely on established laws. However, Konchalovsky doesn't fit the stereotype of a gopnik or criminal. So, what does he mean by "concepts"?

In English, the word "intelligence" closely aligns with what Konchalovsky refers to as "concepts." This term in Russian translates more accurately as "the ability to understand," or simply "understanding." The essence of translation is not merely swapping words but capturing the core meaning behind them.

A common misconception is the term "emotional intelligence," which has gained traction in pop psychology. However, this concept is often misunderstood. The reality is that genuine intelligence is rational; there is no distinct "emotional intelligence." The ability to comprehend others' emotions does exist, but it falls under the broader umbrella of understanding.

The term "intelligentsia" in Russian refers to a group characterized by their understanding and capacity to live by concepts. Contrary to popular belief, an intellectual is not a gopnik but rather someone who possesses the ability to comprehend and live according to these "concepts."

Those who lack this ability often find themselves living by the law. The law serves as a set of rules for individuals who may struggle to understand their surroundings. Understanding requires effort and the ability to adapt to changing contexts. In contrast, adhering to the law is straightforward: read, comprehend, and comply.

In Russian tradition, the term "kon" denotes a similar meaning to "intelligence" and "concepts," emphasizing the ability to understand without direct instruction. Communication among equals is based on shared concepts, while communication between masters and subordinates relies on law.

Consider how many rules you impose on your child. Are these the same rules that apply to you? The disparity raises questions about the nature of authority and understanding.

Reflecting on this topic, I must clarify that my insights do not stem from my legal education but rather from psychological observations. Psychology and psychotherapy are not about morality or legal compliance; they are about adaptation. A person who adapts well to their environment has no psychological issues, whereas one who struggles may face numerous challenges.

Unfortunately, I often encounter colleagues who discuss how to navigate situations strictly through legal frameworks, ignoring the underlying psychological aspects. Psychological issues can only be addressed through understanding and intelligence, not merely by adhering to rules set by authorities.

Despite this, I often hear psychologists advising clients to consult legal texts. If that’s what interests you, by all means, read them.

As I delve into this subject, I recognize that I, like Konchalovsky, may appear to embody the same gopnik mentality. However, my professional background provides me with insights that highlight the lack of understanding in those I work with, ultimately affecting the resolution of psychological issues.

The first video titled "ConLaw Class 1 - The Founding" discusses foundational legal concepts and their implications on society.

In the second video, "ConLaw Class 1 – The Founding," the speaker elaborates on the significance of understanding law within the broader context of human behavior and society.